<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: French immigration policy: History repeated?</title>
	<link>http://migration.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/04/11/french-immigration-policy-history-repeated/</link>
	<description>The official Web log for Great Decisions 2007</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Migration &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Part II: History of French immigration policy</title>
		<link>http://migration.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/04/11/french-immigration-policy-history-repeated/#comment-9</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://migration.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/04/11/french-immigration-policy-history-repeated/#comment-9</guid>
					<description>[...] While addressing the needs of the large Islamic population in France, the government launched a near simultaneous reexamination of the secular values of the Republic. The headscarf affair, discussed in our earlier posting on migration issues in France, tapped a new discussion on religious symbols in schools. A lengthy discussion on “laïcité” – the separation of church and state ensued, which resulted in a new law to prohibit all religious signifiers in schools. This naturally included the removal of Christian crosses and the wearing of the Muslim headscarf and other symbolic relics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While addressing the needs of the large Islamic population in France, the government launched a near simultaneous reexamination of the secular values of the Republic. The headscarf affair, discussed in our earlier posting on migration issues in France, tapped a new discussion on religious symbols in schools. A lengthy discussion on “laïcité” – the separation of church and state ensued, which resulted in a new law to prohibit all religious signifiers in schools. This naturally included the removal of Christian crosses and the wearing of the Muslim headscarf and other symbolic relics. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Central Asia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Identity &#38; Culture; Scholarship &#38; Public Policy</title>
		<link>http://migration.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/04/11/french-immigration-policy-history-repeated/#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://migration.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/04/11/french-immigration-policy-history-repeated/#comment-8</guid>
					<description>[...] See Sourcenotes: General, for Abdelal, et al Cathryn Cluver writes extensively on France&#8217;s politicization of identity and its hazards, posted on FPA&#8217;s Migration blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] See Sourcenotes: General, for Abdelal, et al Cathryn Cluver writes extensively on France&#8217;s politicization of identity and its hazards, posted on FPA&#8217;s Migration blog [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
